Banning Anti-Aging Skincare?

You May Also Like

25 Comments

  1. I’ve seen it with my own eyes on the Upper Eastside in Manhattan 11, 10 year-olds, ridiculous. My opinion parents should intervene and not allow this to happen and of course the advertisements should not target young children for skin care.

  2. It’s good intentioned but it’s not necessarily going to do anything. At the end of the day, parents have the power of the purse. If they don’t want their kids not to have these things, they don’t have to buy it for them.

    1. Exactly plus I’m pretty sure if the parents buy the products themselves they would totally use it plus we live in the age of the internet that these kids will use the parents cards and go wild in website like Amazon and purchase these items so it dumb law imo

  3. It’s not the products, it’s not the stores, it’s the PARENTS. My mpm would never let me buy that stuff at that age. Heck, I wasn’t allowed to wear makeup til I was 14 & even then my mom helped me buy it because she knew better.

  4. I’m going to echo lots of other comments here and say that this is a parental responsibility! If your tween or young teen has enough money to shop at Sephora, their allowance is much too high, and if they’re being influenced by TikTok or Instagram, I’d ask why in the hell does your 13yo have their own social media accounts?! You are their parent, not their friend!

  5. How about parents start parenting. This is absolutely insane. For one, kids are seeing this through social media. I was a 80/90s kid without social media and we knew nothing about anti aging 🤣. Kids today live in a horrible generation.

    1. I think these kids are so lucky to have good skin care products when they become teens. I struggled so much with my skin because the skin care products in the 90s and early 2000s were trash. At least the kids will have clear skin obviously they don’t need anti aging products though lol

  6. Retinol and glycolic acid both can help against acne, wich is common in this age group. I don’t see the big danger and the need for a law like this when some kids maybe really need it because of their acne. Doctors appointments can be expensive or waiting time can be really long. You don’t want to scar your face.

  7. So sad that a 16 yo with acne problems cannot buy a glycolic lotion (just to name one) recommended by a pro derm just because some parents are not parenting. As always, _The righteous pay for sinners_ 🙄

  8. Lol. Imagine being so incapable of a parent that you have to have the nanny state come in and tell the child “No, you can’t buy that” for the first time in its life as if it is the kid’s money paying for said goods…actually, this makes perfect sense for CA.

  9. Ummm when I was a teenager I had to buy over the counter retinol for my acne cause my parents didn’t take me to a dermatologist. I don’t like this for teens. It helped me so much with my confidence where I used to strongly believe I was the ugliest person in the world as a teen and clearing up my skin helped me feel less so

  10. Really irritates me when people wanna punish EVERYONE because PARENTS can’t do their job and watch their children

  11. Parents need to teach them and those store need to give employee a right to say kids don’t use anything extra then regular cleanser moisturizer and sunscreen

  12. Once again, the parents are not doing their jobs. Letting their kids do whatever they want to. Some parents today don’t want to be parents.

  13. I agree and parents are the ones letting their kids go to Sephora and ulta and buy these things: parents need to get a grip on reality

  14. Another thing is parents need to stop letting their kids watch so much social media and let them be influenced by these things that are not made for kids and that way they won’t feel this incessant need to have. What’s popular parents have no boundaries anymore and it’s sickening.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *